Medienberichte und Publikationen rund um Fahrräder, Pedelecs, Technik und Sicherheit

Die häufigsten Sicherheitsrisiken, die uns in der täglichen Arbeit rund um Fahrrad-Sicherheit, -Technik und -Bedienungsanleitungen auffallen, publizieren wir auch in Artikeln in den führenden Fachmagazinen TOUR – Europas Rennrad-Magazin Nr. 1, BIKE – Das Mountainbike Magazin Europas Nr. 1 und E-Bike – Das Pedelec-Magazin, um diese für die Branche wichtigen Informationen einer größeren Öffentlichkeit zugänglich zu machen.

Auch die Eurobike Show Daily, Messezeitschrift der jährlich stattfindenden Eurobike Show, gibt uns seit vielen Jahren die Möglichkeit, unsere Sicht auf wichtige Entwicklungen in der Fahrradbranche in ganzseitigen Artikeln auszuführen.

Darüber hinaus sprechen wir regelmäßig in unabhängigen Fachvorträgen über alle Bereiche der Fahrradtechnik und des Fahrradmarktes. Auch weitere Fach- bzw. Branchenzeitschriften sowie immer häufiger Radio und Fernsehen zitieren uns in ihren Medienberichten und zeigen uns, dass wir mit unseren Hinweisen genau richtig liegen. In der Rubrik AKTUELL erfahren Sie laufend alle Neuigkeiten aus unseren Fachbereichen. Diese Berichte und Publikationen sortieren wir für Sie chronologisch bzw. nach Interessensgebieten. -, January 20, 2021
Reading time 5:35 minutes

Product Safety for Heavy Duty Cargo Bikes: What are the Advantages of a Cargo Bike DIN?

The bicycle auditors Dirk Zedler and Marcus Schröder discuss the applicability of the new cargo bike DIN to heavy-duty cargo bikes.

Commercial heavy-duty bikes with a pedelec25 drive and a total weight of up to 500 kilograms are becoming increasingly relevant. Moreover, the German federal government provides subsidies of up to 2,500 euros for their purchase.

The German traffic law does not set an upper limit on the weight of bicycles. From a legal point of view, heavy-duty cargo bikes are considered bicycles and are therefore not subject to registration nor do they require a licence if the electric pedal assistance remains within the scope of a pedelec25 drive. The bicycle status is an important prerequisite for making heavy-duty cargo bikes an attractive alternative to diesel vehicles for companies - an alternative that politicians would like to see come to fruition.

(...), asked two German bicycle auditors with cargo bike expertise: Dirk Zedler from the Zedler Institute and Marcus Schröder from EFBE Prüftechnik.

Interview: Can manufacturers of heavy-duty cargo bikes with a permissible total weight of over 300 kilograms apply the cargo bike DIN 79010 in a modified way and subsequently declare their cargo bikes as DIN-tested?

Marcus Schröder: Apply - absolutely! However, with the necessary adjustments and with a sense of proportion. Declare it as DIN-tested - no! I see it as "tested in accordance with DIN 79010". In what way do manufacturers have to take the extra weight into account?

Marcus Schröder: The strength tests of components, the brake tests and other relevant elements of the DIN need to be scaled. At some point, the bicycle standard simply doesn't work anymore. We have tested tricycles weighing over 300 kilograms, and that was absolutely OK. But we have also turned down orders when we had the impression that we could not do justice to a heavy-duty cargo bike with standard bicycle tests. What are the differences in liability for manufacturers and users of heavy-duty cargo bike that are "tested in accordance with DIN 79010" compared to DIN-tested cargo bikes that are within the scope of the standard?

Dirk Zedler: This is where it becomes a legal matter. From my practice as an expert, I can report the following:
The Product Safety Law explicitly states that standards can be used to assess the safety of a product. There are high-judicial rulings, which confirm that a judge does not have to take a standard into account in the case of a dispute but can apply other or higher standards if they can be justified. This can be applied to manufacturers.

Compliance with DIN 79010 does not shield cargo bike manufacturers from liability. After all, a standard is only an agreement between interested parties. In the case of DIN 79010, there is also the problem that it was only drafted by German experts. The situation is different for DIN EN 15194 for pedelecs. This is "harmonised" under the European Machinery Directive and therefore has "legal character". Nevertheless, here too, more testing must be done if the scope of application is exceeded, e.g. in terms of weight [Note DIN EN 15194 only applies to a maximum weight of 120 kilos].

This means: In every case of damage, the concrete situation is investigated and, ideally, competent experts have their say.
Therefore, there is no way around the due diligence of each individual manufacturer together with his chosen testing partner. In the event of damage, a final statement will usually have to be made by a court, as lawyers often have conflicting views.

In conclusion, this means for manufacturers of heavy-duty cargo bikes:

It is a good idea to follow the DIN 79010.

However, the DIN must be checked for completeness (which it is not) and its applicability must be justified.

A risk analysis must be carried out that relentlessly reveals the weaknesses of the design, all residual risks, areas requiring further improvements and assesses the applicability of the DIN standard.

As Marcus has already said: "Tested in accordance with DIN 79010" would be the correct term for the manufacturer to use.

About the interviewees
Dirk Zedler
is a publicly appointed and sworn-in expert for bicycles and e-bikes and the Managing Director of the Zedler Institute for Bicycle Technology and Security. He is also a member of the DIN Standards Committee for Bicycles for General and Sporting Use.

Marcus Schröder is the Managing Director of EFBE Prüftechnik, a testing lab for mechanical testing of bicycles, e-bikes and their components. He is also a member of the cargo bike working groups of the DIN Institute and the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN).

Read the entire article here.